With Habermas against Habermas. Deliberation without Consensus

The Habermas-gadamer Debate

ly negated on the basis of a.false c.laim t.. o superiority. ~~ciallife-; the-symmetrkaJ..rc1atioll-betweenpartners in a game is a more apnnooer1 than that ofdoctor~patient.Everyone IS on relatively equal terms in the gallle..in that there are no privileged knowers. There is, however~anlmder­ lying consensus which expresses the ontological primacy of tradition and which is the condition of all ...

Marcuse & Habermas on New Science

Marx's meaning of materialism as well as the extent of Hegel's influence on his thought has been in the center of controversy among Marxists ever since the publication in 1923 of Lukdcs' History and Class Consciousness and Korsch's Marxism and Philosophy with the Frankfurt school, including Marcuse, embracing the Hegelian interpretation. The controversy has resurfaced within the Frankfurt schoo...

The Autopoietic Turn in Habermas’ Legal Philosophy

Since the publication of Between Facts and Norms, it appears to have gone largely unremarked by crit‐ ical theorists that Habermas has wholly abandoned the neo‐Parsonian systems‐theoretic account of so‐ cial systems developed in his middle period. In this paper, I argue not only that Habermas has developed a new vocabulary and theoretical structure for dealing with social systems ...

Did Habermas Cede Nature to the Positivists?

Action theory in Habermas and educational practices

In this paper I explore the potential for viewing education as an “unrestricted communication community” (Habermas 1990: 88), using categorisations from Habermas of different kinds of action as analytical tools for examining educational practices. For the paper, I pursue two main themes: 1) how the concept of communicative action in relation to the three forms of knowledge-constitutive interest...